Sunday, April 13, 2014

Does the Melting Pot Have Privilege?

Our discussions of mixing, misconceptions, white privilege here and abroad, and the politics that coincide with all of these caused my attention to be drawn to some interesting articles from National Geographic and The Huffington Post. They take a look at the visually changing categories of race and identity and ask the question, "What does the average American really look like?" There are changing combinations of facial features and hair types carried further with each generation. They are very interesting articles with equally interesting and "real" photos. The topic of racial ambiguity has been present since the earlier units of our class and continues to be relevant even now.
 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/01/national-geographic-changing-face-of-america-photos_n_4024415.html

http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2013/10/changing-faces/funderburg-text

What would happen if (or when) the members of the melting pot became the dominant racial category in America? It is entirely plausible that, in time, this could happen. There would be changes in advertising and other forms of marketing. We would walk more of a blurred line in our dealings with one another. All of the medical information based on racial categorization would not be as specifically applicable in a racially blended society. All of this is very interesting, but an  intriguing question is one that concerns privilege. Would white privilege die out without white dominance or would that privilege carry over to the new dominant group? We have spent a lot of time looking at how white privilege operates in the US. Perhaps, on our own turf, privilege would simply fade into equality, and we would see the fabulous results of what we have been hoping would eventually occur. However, our interaction with other humans is not limited to our continent.

The movie Babel showed us how white privilege acts outside of American boundaries. Real life stories in the media alert us when white journalists, businessmen, or politicians are abducted or killed. If the US was no longer predominantly white, white "Americans" may be seen as an even more valued and endangered species. They might find an even higher price on their head while traveling abroad (even if privilege was still on their side) because of their limited numbers. Could the new majority then travel without many of the worries of safety because of their racial ambiguity? I've heard quite a few people over the years brag about "American" privilege. Being from America makes you special and "we" dominate the world.......
But without whiteness, would all of us cease to be special?

We've discussed being black and visiting Jamaica as opposed to being black and living in Jamaica. We all seem to assume some amount of American privilege regardless of racial affiliations. So what then does equality truly mean to America? Do we really want it or do we want privilege? Can privilege exist without white faces to anchor it; especially if, abroad, Americans come to represent "just another ethnic face?"

2 comments:

  1. You pose a very interesting question: Would America remain "special" without whiteness? To Americans, yes. I think the majority of Americans, no matter what race they claim, will always think of themselves as superior and deserving of privilege.

    As for the question concerning the erasure of privilege, wherever a dominant group exists there is an inferior group. We operate in a dualistic society where mutually exclusive and opposing binaries filter and dictate our values. Those values and privileges will change over time (as history shows), unless our society undergoes some radical transformations. Our language is even based on binaries. When we use terms like "dominant," then an inferior must exist. How do we know what good is without bad?

    An afterthought: Presently, whiteness exists as the absence of race. The idea of the melting pot race could be seen as exactly that. Racial ambiguity could become a newer version of whiteness, just with a different name.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Michelle I really enjoyed this post and the enlightening thoughts that you have provided in regards to white privilege, mixing, and misconceptions. In reply to the question, "Would white privilege die out without white dominance, or would that privilege care over to the new dominate group," my first initial thought was yes, white privilege will die out without white dominance because if white becomes a minority then there is generally a lack of privilege associated with minorities or marginalized groups, which then will allow for the new dominate group to gain privilege. After rethinking the question, I then consider the fact how white has always been the superior group and is used in comparison to show the difference of other races, so despite a new dominate group white will always be the example used to compare difference. With the overarching goal to achieve equality and embrace diversity for all, we must erase words such as dominate and privileged from our vocabulary. In agreement with Kathleen, our language has been based on binaries. Will we ever be able to look beyond difference as a mean to distinguish dominance and privilege?

    ReplyDelete